T.R. JUDICIARY
13. Law Office
Basis: 2015/ 42401
Decision: 2015 / 38509
Decision Date: 31.12.2015
Supreme Court Decision
COURT: Civil Court of First Instance
DECISION
The case is related to the dispute arising from the insurance law.
According to the amendment made in Article 27 of the Law on the Amendment of the Law on Judges and Prosecutors and some Laws and Decrees with the Force of Law No. 6572 and dated 04.12.2014 and Article 14 of the Law No. In accordance with the decision of the First Presidency Board of the Supreme Court, dated 19.01.2015 and numbered 2015/8, in addition to the claims arising from the insurance law, based on Article 67 of the İİK
As of 01.02.2015, the task of reviewing the judgments and decisions rendered as a result of the lawsuits regarding the cancellation of the objection and the determination that there is no debtor arising from the 72nd article of the İİK has been given to the 11th Law Department of the Court of Cassation as of 01.02.2015.
According to the amendment made in Article 60 of the Supreme Court Law No. 2797 and the Law on Amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure with the Law on the Court of Cassation No. 6644 and entered into force by being published in the Official Gazette dated 11.04.2015, the appeals review is made by the court. If the relevant legal office, to which the file was sent to him, does not consider himself responsible for the division of labor as a result of the preliminary examination to be carried out within one month, it was necessary to send the case file to the Court of Cassation Legal Division of Labor Investigation Board in order to determine the responsible office, since it had to send the file to the Legal Division of Labor Investigation Board with its justification.
CONCLUSION: It was unanimously decided on 31.12.2015 that the case file be sent to the Supreme Court Legal Division of Labor Investigation Board for the determination of the responsible office.
