In the decisions he made during the Supreme Court period, he accepts that there may be intellectual community in cases where more than one result occurs with an act, and accepts that what should be understood from a single act is not a single result, but a single action. Although the act constitutes a separate act, the point that is meant to be expressed by the act of being single in the legal sense is that even if there are more than one act in the natural sense, these acts are accepted as a single act by forming a unity in the evaluation due to legal reasons. In intellectual congregation, the jurisprudence states that the singularity of an act or action does not mean a natural one, but a LEGAL one. Although we have used the title of singularity of verb-multiplicity of verb, since it is mentioned that more than one crime is committed with a single act in Article 43, paragraph 2 and Article 44 of the Turkish Penal Code, we should state that the purpose of the verb is movement and this title should be understood as unity of action-multiplicity of action. . Excluding the chain crime relationship
As a matter of fact, in order to talk about an association relationship, the movement must be unique, and if the movement is more than one in the real sense, it is not possible to talk about an association relationship. conditions must be clarified.
